MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2253202643 · doi:10.3138/seminar.2015.51.4.357

Berlin’s Futurity in Zafer Şenocak’s <i>Gefährliche Verwandtschaft</i> (1998) and Marica Bodrožić’s <i>Kirschholz und alte Gefühle</i> (2012)

2015· article· en· W2253202643 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeDepictionHistoryAllusionPoliticsArtLiteratureArt historyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article traces and compares the use of Berlin as a site through which to renegotiate memories of the Armenian genocide, the Holocaust, and the 1990s wars in former Yugoslavia in Zafer Şenocak’s Gefährliche Verwandtschaft (1998) and Marica Bodrožić’s Kirschholz und alte Gefühle (2012). The author argues that both novels experiment with narrative and stylistic devices, such as ellipsis and allusion, in order to leave the represented past open for present and future renegotiation to safeguard the past from becoming co-opted by identity politics. The author concludes by showing that, next to all of their similarities, the novels’ differ in their depiction of Berlin. Whereas Şenocak’s post-Wende Berlin is ultimately still located within a Germany determined by its past, Bodrožić’s Berlin gestures towards the city’s European present and future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it