Reconstruire la philosophie africaine: à la recherche des lieux d’ancrage d’une pensée du futur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article aims to restart the debate regarding the social function of philosophy that was instigated in the 1970s by Olabiyi B. Yaï, Paulin Hountondji, Prosper Laleye and, more recently, by Ngoma-Binda. The article argues that if this debate is to be resurrected in the present, it must be done so by reconstructing African philosophy as social research and as an exploration of the possibilities inscribed within African reality. If African philosophy wants to have something relevant to say about contemporary social problems and contribute to the opening up of new futures, it must be built on social practices through which people may express their hopes and suffering as well as engage in re-imagining the future. What is required is an authenticity of philosophical practice in the struggle for emancipatory democracy and social justice. This is especially true where philosophy is said to be meaningful only when it is understood as a practice in a given context that it shapes at the same time as it is shaped by it. Thus, to reconstruct African philosophy is to revitalize it through contact with everyday life where the subject encounters his or her history. To reconstruct African philosophy is to confront it with the challenge of the ordinary where one’s relationship with the world and others is rediscovered. Le présent article a pour visée de reprendre le débat sur l’utilité sociale de la philosophie africaine soulevé naguère par Olabiyi B. Yaï, Paulin Hountondji, Prosper Laleye et, plus récemment, par Ngoma Binda. Il soutient que ce débat doit être repris aujourd’hui en termes de reconstruction de la philosophie africaine comme recherche sociale et exploration des possibles inscrits dans la réalité africaine. Si la philosophie africaine veut avoir quelque chose de pertinent à dire sur les problèmes contemporains et contribuer à ouvrir les horizons du futur, elle doit avoir comme point de départ les pratiques sociales à travers lesquelles les peuples africains expriment leur souffrance et leur espoir social, et s’engagent dans la ré-imagination du futur à construire. Il s’agit ici d’une exigence d’authenticité de la pratique philosophique en temps de lutte pour la démocratie comme processus d’émancipation et pour la justice sociale, surtout si l’on accepte que la philosophie n’a de consistance que d’être un acte accompli en situation, modifiant celle-ci dans sa structure tout comme il est informé par elle. Ainsi, reconstruire la philosophie africaine, c’est lui donner un nouvel élan au contact avec le quotidien, où le sujet fait la rencontre avec son histoire; c’est recommencer la philosophie à l’épreuve de l’ordinaire, où l’on apprend à ressaisir nos liens avec le monde et les autres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".