Investigating Online Consumer Behavior in Iran Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this research is to study the online consumer behavior in Iran using a combination of Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with other variables. This study is objective, analytical, and descriptive. The subject of this research is online shoppers in the city of Shiraz. Sampling was simple random and was collected via the Internet. According to the conceptual model, the minimum required sample for this study was 80 samples; however, to ensure accuracy 390 questionnaires were collected. To analyze the data, structural equation modeling was used, using partial least squares (PLS) and analysis of one way variance (ANOVA). Results show that in online purchasing in Iran perceived ease of use (PEOU) has a positive effect on controllability and self-efficacy of individuals. Trust has a positive effect on the attitude and controllability of individuals. Media has a positive effect on subjective norms. Cost reduction has a positive effect on the attitude of individuals. Finally, age and income influence the intention of individuals in online purchasing. The other hypotheses of this study were not confirmed. It can be concluded that factors such as PEOU, trust, media, cost reduction, age and income affect online consumer behavior in Iran.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".