MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2253470265

[Early maladaptive processes, depression and alexithymia in suicidal hospitalized adolescents].

2001· article· en· W2253470265 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Niela M. Hirsch, M. Hautekèete, F. Kochman

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaPsychologyFeelingDysfunctional familyDepression (economics)Clinical psychologyPsychiatrySocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alexithymia characterizes people having important difficulties in putting their feelings and moods into words. Adolescents' depression shows some peculiarities: one of them, which is often observed, is the equal difficulty of imparting one's feelings to others. This research concerns adolescents who attempted suicide. We study classical factors: depression and hopelessness. But our main objective is at first to study the relationship between attempted suicide, depression, hopelessness and alexithymia. The second objective of our study deals with the the prominent part of early schematas in this complex inter-relation. Maladaptative early schematas are no doubt involved in dysfunctional schematas found in depression and hopelessness. As a consequence, we would like to verify the following hypothesis: maladaptative early schematas are very numerous and specific among adolescents who attempted suicide. These schematas are the core of the complex inter-relation between attempted suicide, depression, hopelessness, suicide risk, suicide relapse and alexithymia. We have compared a group of normal subjects (who did not try to take their owns lives) and a group of people who did. First, we have found that the latter are more prone to alexithymia: a large majority of these subjects exceeds by far the accepted norm of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. We have proved that the subjects who have attempted suicide also accumulate maladaptative early schematas. The qualitative analyse of these schematas leads to a possible explanation of the tendency to self destruction. Moreover there are apparently important differences between subjects who, in the past-experienced or did not experience a major depressive episode. The analysis of the relationships between the various factors of our study brings us to the conclusion that there is an unmistakable causal link between maladaptative early schematas and the interactive set (depression-hopelessness-major depressive episode-alexithymia) all these being part of attempted suicide and forming an integrant part of a whole which is the vulnerability to the suicide. Studying the various steps of early schematas seems to be quite promising as far as depression and suicide are concerned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies→French-language works237,207→