The Poisson Maximum Entropy Model for Homogeneous Poisson Processes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our main interest is parameter estimation using maximum entropy methods in the prediction of future events for Homogeneous Poisson Processes when the distribution governing the distribution of the parameters is unknown. We intend to use empirical Bayes techniques and the maximum entropy principle to model the prior information. This approach has also been motivated by the success of the gamma prior for this problem, since it is well known that the gamma maximizes Shannon entropy under appropriately chosen constraints. However, as an alternative, we propose here to apply one of the often used methods to estimate the parameters of the maximum entropy prior. It consists of moment matching, that is, maximizing the entropy subject to the constraint that the first two moments equal the empirical ones and we obtain the truncated normal distribution (truncated below at the origin) as a solution. We also use maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) methods to estimate the parameters of the truncated normal distribution for this case. These two solutions, the gamma and the truncated normal, which maximize the entropy under different constraints are tested as to their effectiveness for prediction of future events for homogeneous Poisson processes by measuring their coverage probabilities, the suitably normalized lengths of their prediction intervals and their goodness-of-fit measured by the Kullback–Leibler criterion and a discrepancy measure. The estimators obtained by these methods are compared in an extensive simulation study to each other as well as to the estimators obtained using the completely noninformative Jeffreys’ prior and the usual frequency methods. We also consider the problem of choosing between the two maximum entropy methods proposed here, that is, the gamma prior and the truncated normal prior, estimated both by matching of the first two moments and, by maximum likelihood, when faced with data and we advocate the use of the sample skewness and kurtosis. The methods are also illustrated on two examples: one concerning the occurrence of mammary tumors in laboratory animals taking part in a carcinogenicity experiment and the other, a warranty dataset from the automobile industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it