MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

In Vivo Investigation of a Rabbit Model of Aortic Valve Disease

2008· article· en· W2253593217 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amanda M. Hamilton, John A. Ronald, Kyle A. MacLean, Maria Drangova, Zamir G. Khan, James C. Lacefield, Brian K. Rutt, Kem A. Rogers, Derek R. Boughner

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIn vivoAortic valveEx vivoStenosisMagnetic resonance imagingCardiologyPopulationPathologyPathologicalStroke (engine)Internal medicineRadiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aortic valve sclerosis (AVS) is a vascular disease affecting more than 25% of the population over age 65; it advances to lethal aortic stenosis in 5% of people over age 75. Despite significant clinical consequences, no effective treatment exists other than surgical AV replacement. Long‐term low‐level cholesterol feeding in New Zealand White rabbits results in the development of AVS. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ex vivo ultrasound and histological analysis were used to examine our rabbit model of AV disease. Our MRI technique allows for the examination of individual subjects in vivo. Aortic valve cusps were observed to thicken over time and diseased valves displayed regurgitant flow after 15 months on the cholesterol diet. Histological analysis of diseased valves revealed AVS with human‐like pathological characteristics including extensive thickening, lipid deposition, mineralization, and immune cell infiltration. This rabbit model, coupled with our MRI technique, allows for the serial examination of AV disease progress in individual animals, thereby enabling the investigation of disease treatments including dietary control or statin therapy. Funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→