MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Phase I Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (InO) Combined With R-GDP For Relapsed/Refractory CD22+ B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL)

2013· article· en· W2253719787 on OpenAlexaff
Randeep Sangha, Andrew Davies, Nam H. Dang, Michinori Ogura, David MacDonald, Angela Volkert, Revathi Ananthakrishnan, Kenneth T. Luu, Joseph Boni, Erik Vandendries, Yeow‐Tee Goh

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityMedicineCalicheamicinInternal medicineRituximabRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologyRegimenAdverse effectNeutropeniaFebrile neutropeniaLymphomaToxicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background CD22 is expressed on most B-NHL. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated with calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic antitumor antibiotic with activity in relapsed/refractory B-NHL. This study explored the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of InO plus rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (R-GDP) for subjects with CD22+ B-NHL. Methods Part 1 (dose escalation phase, n = 27) enrolled patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-NHL treated with ≥1 prior R-chemo regimen using an up-and-down independent dose-escalation schema for G and P. InO (0.8 mg/m2 day 2) was combined with R-GDP (R 375 mg/m2, G, and P day 1; oral D 40 mg days 1-4) on a 21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. R-GDP (R 375 mg/m2 day 1; G 1000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8; D 40 mg days 1-4; P 75 mg/m2 day 1) is a regimen used in some patients with relapsed/refractory B-NHL. Part 2 (MTD confirmation cohort, n = 10) enrolled additional pts to further evaluate the safety and tolerability of the MTD determined in Part 1. Confirmation of the MTD required a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of < 33% in Cycle 1 and < 4 pts discontinuing prior to Cycle 3 due to adverse event (AE). Part 3 (MTD expansion cohort, n = 18) enrolled additional pts to further evaluate the preliminary efficacy of InO when given in combination with R-GDP. Results Fifty-five pts were treated: 21 DLBCL, 14 FL, 12 MCL, 4 SLL, 1 MZL, and 3 other indolent B-NHL. Characteristics: aged 25 to 81 y (median 65 y); 51 with ECOG PS ≤1; median of 2 prior chemo regimens (range 1-6); 8 refractory to prior therapy. The dose-escalation phase (Part 1) identified the MTD as InO 0.8 mg/m2, R 375mg/m2, G 500 mg/m2 (day 1 only), D 40 mg, P 50 mg/m2. This MTD was confirmed in Part 2, in which 3 pts had DLTs (2 with grade 4 platelets, 1 with febrile neutropenia). The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs included thrombocytopenia (69%), neutropenia (56%), lymphopenia (22%), leukopenia (18%), anemia (16%), and febrile neutropenia (11%). Twenty-one pts completed all 6 treatment cycles; the median number of cycles completed was 4 (range 1-6). The most common AEs leading to dose reductions and temporary dose delays included thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia. For the 55 pts enrolled, the overall response rate (ORR) was 45% (n = 25), including 22% of pts (n = 12) who achieved a complete response (CR). Of the 55 pts enrolled, 46 had both a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment reported. In this population to date, the ORR was 54%, including 26% who achieved a CR. 2 pts remain on treatment at the time of data collection. Additional efficacy data are summarized in Table 1 . Pharmacokinetic samples were collected for pts enrolled in the MTD confirmation and expansion cohorts. Fifty-three pts have discontinued treatment, including 21 who completed the planned number of cycles, 12 due to AE (including 8 pts with grade 2/3 thrombocytopenia that did not resolve to grade 1 or better within the 28-day dose delay window allowed per protocol, and 1 each grade 5 oesophageal obstruction, grade 2 skin lesion and grade 4 tumor lysis syndrome) and 12 due to PD. Fifteen deaths have been reported, 12 due to disease progression and 3 due to other causes, including graft-versus-host disease, toxicity after allograft, and sequelae of subdural hematoma not related to study drug (n = 1 each). Conclusions InO 0.8 mg/m2 with R-GDP is tolerable at reduced doses of G (500 mg/m2 day 1 only) and P (50 mg/m2). Preliminary efficacy in the MTD expansion cohort is encouraging. Follow-up for PFS and OS is currently ongoing. Disclosures: Sangha: Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Off Label Use: This abstract presents findings from a phase I study of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; this drug is investigational and is not approved for use in any indication in any country. Davies:Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ogura:Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Volkert:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Ananthakrishnan:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Luu:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Boni:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Vandendries:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Goh:Gilead Scienes: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hospira: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→