MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2253739114

Sea Ice – Obstacle Vs. Opportunity Reconciling Two Views of Landfast Sea Ice

2005· article· en· W2253739114 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J Rowell, L Metcalfe

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayObstacleOceanographyProcess (computing)Sea iceGeographyBusinessGeologyArchaeologyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses how the Labrador Inuit Association (LIA) and Voisey's Bay Nickel Company Ltd. (VBNC) broke the impasse between them over the issue of shipping nickel concentrate through landfast ice from the mine site near Voisey's Bay to markets in the south. It describes the terms and conditions for winter shipping and the process through which Labrador Inuit consented to winter shipping, and how, once they took ownership of the problems winter shipping presents to Inuit, they became the ultimate problem solvers. A Shipping Agreement negotiated between LIA and VBNC sets out VBNC's commitments to resolving the outstanding problems. This paper also identifies some lessons learned during this process. This is a companion paper to Rowell and Metcalfe (2005).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.034
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic ConditionsSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207