MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2253775783 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2014.1110

Robust inverse compensation and control of a class of non‐linear systems with unknown asymmetric backlash non‐linearity

2015· article· en· W2253775783 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBacklashControl theory (sociology)Compensation (psychology)InverseLinearityRobust controlMathematicsComputer scienceControl (management)Control systemEngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A robust control approach with the inverse backlash compensation is presented for a class of non‐linear systems preceded by unknown asymmetric backlash non‐linearity. Firstly, the analytical expressions of the inverse compensation error for an asymmetric backlash are obtained by introducing new indicator functions, which make it possible to design a corresponding controller for the asymmetric input backlash. With the developed compensation error expression, conventional robust control approaches can be utilised to deal with such a non‐smooth non‐linear system. As an illustration, a robust adaptive control strategy is applied to demonstrate the approach. The developed control laws ensure the robust inverse compensation and achieve tracking within a desired accuracy. Finally, simulations performed on an unstable and uncertain non‐linear system illustrate and clarify the effectiveness of the developed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it