MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2254078828 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511550799.008

Moscow's changing fortunes under three regimes

2004· book-chapter· en· W2254078828 on OpenAlexaff
James H. Bater

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRussia and Soviet political economy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three distinctly different cultural, economic, and political epochs have characterized Moscow's role as a world city. The first was that of imperial Russia. This epoch lasted several centuries until internal social, political, and economic dysfunctional conditions combined to set the stage for the Russian revolution of 1917. This event of global significance ushered in Soviet socialism, a theoretically egalitarian system which lasted until its own internal inconsistencies caused it to implode in 1991. Since then a new political order of fifteen independent countries has arisen from the ashes of the former Soviet empire. In 1991 Russia was launched on the road to liberal democracy and a market economy, or what passes for both in this new epoch. Contemporary Moscow retains its historical role of capital city. It still retains claim, albeit presently somewhat diminished, to world city status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicRussia and Soviet political economyFrench-language works237,207