MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2254181063 · doi:10.1126/science.aab1495

Stakeholders in climate science: Beyond lip service?

2015· article· en· W2254181063 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicole Klenk, Katie Meehan, Sandra Lee Pinel, Fabián Méndez, Pablo Torres Lima, Daniel M. Kammen

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMinistério da EducaçãoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorU.S. Department of State
KeywordsCoproductionService (business)BusinessClimate scienceKnowledge managementPublic relationsClimate changePolitical scienceComputer scienceMarketingGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Local knowledge coproduction must be rewarded

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.076
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.076
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.013
Scholarly communication0.0200.023
Open science0.0030.028
Research integrity0.0100.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.775
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicClimate Change Communication and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207