MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2254184150 · doi:10.1385/0-89603-272-8:397

Development of Lepidopteran Cell Lines

2003· review· en· W2254184150 on OpenAlexaff
S. S. Sohi

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaOntario Forest Research InstituteCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ever since the early reports of Goldschmidt (1) and Trager (2) on the in vitro cultivation of lepidopteran tissues, researchers have been interested in using lepidopteran cell cultures for investigations in insect pathology, genetics, and physiology. With the successful development of continuous cell lines by Gaw et al. (3) and Grace (4), interest in the use of lepidopteran cell cultures increased dramatically (5–9). As a result of this increased interest, over 150 lepidopteran continuous cell lines were reported by 1991 (10–4), and several additional cell lines have been developed from lepidoptera since then (15– 17, Sohi unpublished data). With the recent advances in biotechnology and the development of baculovirus expression vectors, lepidopteran cell cultures have become invaluable for basic biological and biotechnological research (18, 19).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207