MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2254363106 · doi:10.71163/zchinr.2006.227-250

2005 Bibliography of Academic Writings in the Field of Chinese Law in Western Languages

2006· article· de· W2254363106 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Knut Benjamin Pißler

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Chinesisches Recht · 2006
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadEuropean CommissionUniversity of OxfordEmory UniversityStrongFordham UniversityPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of WashingtonYork UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityGeorge Mason UniversityUniversity of Cambridge
KeywordsGermanBibliographyField (mathematics)ClassicsLawHistoryLinguisticsPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2 Writings in other European languages could only partly be considered. 3We admit that this bibliography does not comprehensively include all literature in western languages on Chinese law

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.014
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Chinesisches RechtSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207