MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2254376288 · doi:10.18192/clg-cgl.v4i1.827

De l’auto ségrégation à l’effacement du particularisme communautaire : le cas des Cantonais de Manille. (Philippines)

2012· article· fr· W2254376288 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCulture and Local Governance · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilippine History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyPolitical scienceEthnologyArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé: La communauté chinoise aux Philippines est évaluée entre 800 000 et un million d’individus. La moitié de ce groupe réside dans la région de Manille, la capitale du pays. Plus de 90% des Chinois ont leurs racines dans la province littorale du Fujian, les autres sont originaires de la région de Guanzhou (Canton). Arrivés plus tardivement aux Philippines, les Cantonais ont développé des formes d’intégration spécifiques tant au niveau spatial, professionnel et associatif ; lesquelles sont aussi une réponse au flux migratoire réduit puis à son extinction. L’émigration vers l’Amérique du nord pour les Cantonais a constitué une solution pour pallier sa faible intégration économique dans la capitale philippine. La communauté cantonaise de Manille représente un cas d’étude original à l’heure où les flux de populations chinoises sont de plus en plus importants dans le monde. Mots clés :Chinois, Cantonais, Manille, Philippines, Canada, marquage visuel, repli communautaire Abstract:The Chinese community settled in the Philippines members are between 800 000 to one million. Half of it stays in Manila and its region. More than 90 % of the Chinese has their roots in the coastal province of Fujian, the others are from Guangzhou area (Canton). Cantonese migrated lately to the Philippines and developed proper integration ways, spatially, professionally, mostly through a tight association network. Those associations correspond to a light migration wave and to its nowadays extinction. Migrate to North America for a Cantonese person is an opportunity to avoid a lack of economical integration in the capital city of the Philippines. The Manila Cantonese community represents an original case study at a time of massive waves of Chinese populations around the world. Key Words:Chinese, Cantonese, Manila, Philippines, Canada, visual aspects, community fold (self withdrawal)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it