MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2254552512 · doi:10.3233/kes-150323

A family of honey-bee optimization algorithms for Max-CSPs

2016· article· en· W2254552512 on OpenAlexaff
Ines Mathlouthi, Sadok Bouamama

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationHoney beeComputer scienceProcess (computing)Constraint (computer-aided design)AlgorithmConstraint satisfaction problemMathematicsArtificial intelligenceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents new approaches for maximal constraint satisfaction problems (Max-CSPs). Inspired by the honey-bee marriage process, our approaches try to reach a solution that satisfies as many constraints as possible in a reasonable period of time. Our approaches are a centralized and distribu ted honey-bee optimization enhanced by a new parameter called local optimum detector. The latter allows detection of the local optimum. In this paper, newer algorithms and their experimental results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering SystemsSame topicConstraint Satisfaction and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207