Prendre sa place dans le monde: dynamiques interculturelles et stratégies interlinguistiques du théâtre de Robert Lepage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans les années 1980, le théâtre québécois s’est émancipé d’un certain nombre de paradigmes sociopolitiques au profit d’interrogations plus universelles, reflétant à travers ses personnages la quête identitaire d’un référent intime. Le théâtre de Robert Lepage atteste de cette nouvelle orientation, notamment dans sa représentation stratégique des rapports interlinguistiques. Au cœur de la poétique lepagienne du plurilinguisme, le français du Québec apparaît comme une langue de communication qui, tout en permettant d’assumer les spécificités culturelles, refuse les rapports de pouvoir et fonde la rencontre harmonieuse avec l’autre. Dès lors, plutôt que de l’associer au désenchantement post-référendaire, pourquoi ne pas considérer ce théâtre comme une forme de «langagement»?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".