MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2254703436

Calcium peroxide oxidation of soil impacted by various spills : an attempt to meet Alberta non-hazardous landfill cover criteria

2016· other· en· W2254703436 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueVIUSpace (Vancouver Island University Library) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Roads University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHazardous wasteEnvironmental scienceCover (algebra)Waste managementSoil coverEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental chemistrySoil waterChemistryEngineeringSoil science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large volumes of contaminated soil are created daily at Alberta's industrial, oil and gas facilities. This soil is impacted with a variety of contaminants from multiple small spills co-mingled into a single containment bin. Due to lack of effective and economical remediation options, this material is transported to Class II or centrally located Class I landfills for disposal. A modified Fenton treatment was developed using calcium peroxide, citric acid and iron to oxidize hydrocarbons. Treatment was attempted on soil bins to establish if partial remediation could allow soil to be reused as landfill cover at local Class II facilities with stricter acceptance criteria than generic Class II landfills. Treatment resulted in an average of 19% hydrocarbon reduction and altered the classification of 18% of bins to meet stricter landfill criteria. Treatment was found not to be cost effective considering current landfill disposal costs and lack of government incentives for remediation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVIUSpace (Vancouver Island University Library)Same topicLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesFrench-language works237,207