MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2254746281 · doi:10.1021/acs.joc.5b02553

The Carbocation Rearrangement Mechanism, Clarified

2016· article· en· W2254746281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsCarbocationChemistryProtonationComputational chemistryCyclopropaneElectrophileReaction mechanismKinetic isotope effectQuantum chemicalMechanism (biology)IonStereochemistryPhotochemistryDeuteriumMoleculeOrganic chemistryRing (chemistry)CatalysisPhysicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of protonated cyclopropane (PCP(+)) structures in carbocation rearrangement is a decades-old topic that continues to confound. Here, quantum-chemical computations (PBE molecular dynamics, PBE and CCSD optimizations, CCSD(T) energies) are used to resolve the issue. PCP(+) intermediates are neither edge-protonated nor corner-protonated (normally) but possess "closed" structures mesomeric between these two. An updated mechanism for hexyl ion rearrangement is presented and shown to resolve past mysteries from isotope-labeling experiments. A new table of elementary-step barrier heights is provided. The mechanism and barrier heights should be useful in understanding and predicting product distributions in organic reactions, including petroleum modification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it