MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W225494348 · doi:10.5070/l4171005109

A Field of Exciting and Diversified Opportunities: An Interview with Donna Brinton

2009· article· en· W225494348 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIssues in Applied Linguistics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaLibrary scienceProfessional developmentSociologyPolitical sciencePedagogyMedia studiesLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Field of Exciting and Diversified Opportunities: An Inter- view with Donna Brinton Innhwa Park University of California, Los Angeles Donna M. Brinton retired in November 2006 from her position in the Depart- ment of Applied Linguistics & TESL at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) to devote more time to her work in international teacher development. She currently serves as Senior Lecturer in TESOL at the Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California. Looking back at her invaluable contribution dur- ing the 27 years of service at UCLA, we come to appreciate the breadth and depth of her career. She served in the capacities of Academic Coordinator of the UCLA ESL Service Courses, Lecturer in Applied Linguistics, and Associate Director of UCLA’s Center for World Languages. She is the co-author and co-editor of several professional texts including Content-Based Second Language Instruction, The Content-Based Classroom, Teaching Pronunciation, New Ways in Content-Based Instruction, New Ways in ESP, and Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. She has also co-authored several English language textbooks, on-line content-based lessons for EFL learners 1 , and numerous articles in refereed journals and edited texts. For twelve years she also co-edited The CATESOL Journal. Adding to this impressive list of professional achievements, she has con- ducted short-term international teacher training and program evaluation in Thai- land, Vietnam, Myanmar, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, New Zealand, China, Canada, Mexico, Guatemala, Colombia, Bolivia, Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Brazil, Israel, Senegal, Mali, South Africa, Mozambique, Madagascar, Mauritius, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Syria, Lebanon, Tunisia, Morocco, Libya, and Curacao. Finally, with co-authors Marianne Celce-Murcia and Janet Goodwin, she recently completed the 2 nd edition of Teaching Pronunciation and is currently working on the second edition of The Structure of Modern English (with Laurel J. Brinton). In this interview, Donna reflects on her years at UCLA, her involvement with different projects such as teacher training and program evaluation, and her experience in material development. She also shares her thoughts on publishing and attending academic conferences. As someone who has held numerous sig- nificant roles such as lecturer, teacher trainer, educational consultant, and author, Donna gives insightful advice to current graduate students in the field of Applied Linguistics and TESL. Innhwa: I feel very fortunate to have had the opportunity to learn from you while you were teaching at UCLA, and to be able to have this continuing relationship with you. Thank you very much for doing this interview with us. Issues in Applied Linguistics © 2009, Regents of the University of California ISSN 1050-4273 Vol. 17 No. 1, 51-65

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it