MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2255210250 · doi:10.25071/1923-9408.25531

À condition d'être femme. Violette Leduc ou quand le misogynie fait écrire

2004· article· fr· W2255210250 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Josée Bergeron

Bibliographic record

VenueTessera · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through Violette Leduc sautobiographical trilogy, this article shows how the exorcism ofthe female body andfemale sexuality becomes an impetus for writing.By questioning the textual figurations ofself-shame, this text underlines the paradoxical tension, which ties a "feminist" writer to a phalocentric system ofthought.This reflection wishes to establish the psychic and literary influence brought on by the frequentation ofmale worlds and to shed light on certain kinship between writing and the use of the female body.In short, the reading ofViolette Leducs texts proposed here illustrates the way that an exhibitionism of enunciation may serve as a counterpoint to the multiform experience ofmisogyny.Penser l'ceuvre de Violette Leduc, c'est immediatement soulever la question de son appartenance au champ de la litterature feministe.Si son ceuvre est d'abord une revendication d'existence, elle n'estjamais un cri.Il s'agit bien plus d'une plainte qui fend ['ame par l'expiation obligee d'une faute dont elle est le fruit honteux, une «mouche sur un linge blanc i » (Leduc 1964,56), autant qu'elle fend le corps par cette assomption difficile mais incessante de la feminite.Dne breche marque le portrait de La Biitarde, et le texte est l'ouverture nouvelle d'ou emane un rale de d6tresse.Violette Leduc est ['enfant non desiree, mais elle est aussi et surtout la femme non desirable qui, dans l'amour comme dans la litterature, implore: «Defriche, tu as des terres acote de toi» (FT, 390).Violette violee dans son orgueil, fleur exposee qui s'empourpre; le seul prenom de cette femme ecorchee resonne d'une souffrance singuliere.I..:audace de Violette Leduc araconter sa decouverte de l'erotisme homosexuel ii tout comme son admiration amoureuse pour Simone de Beauvoir ont certainement contribue a la situer dans une perspective «feministe».D'un roman a l'autre, l'histoire de Violette Leduc se repMe: il s'agit d'une enonciation du corps feminin dans son desir, sa souffrance ou sa faim, tout autant qu'un plaidoyer en faveur d'une affirmation de soi libre et impudique.Voix feministe?Risquer une classification absolue s'avere inefficace dans le cas d'une auteure qui incarne a peu pres toutes les formes de marginalite.Enfant naturelle d'une bonne, jeune fille solitaire, femme laide et homosexuelle, trafiquante et voleuse; Violette Leduc est en rupture avec un ordre social fonde sur une domination de la pensee masculine phallocentrique.D'ailleurs, la voix de cette ecrivaine marginale s'entend d'abord comme une reponse au discours misogyne dans la mesure ou celui-ci con90it le corps feminin comme «le point de depart et le lieu d'election de cette

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTesseraSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207