Le patrimoine méconnu des bois sacrés de la ville de Koudougou (Burkina Faso) : de la reconnaissance à la sauvegarde
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pour des raisons diverses, les sociétés rurales africaines ont organisé l’espace en privilégiant des lieux sacrés dotés d’interdits. Ces bois sacrés sont rattrapés par les dynamiques urbaines qui leur disputent l’espace. Le patrimoine que constituent ces jardins sacrés demeure inconnu du fait qu’il ne répond pas aux critères occidentaux du patrimoine culturel. Pour comprendre l’évolution des jardins sacrés et dans la perspective de leur valorisation, des entretiens auprès des responsables coutumiers et des services techniques complétés par une analyse spatiale ont été organisés à Koudougou. Il en ressort que ces jardins séculaires possèdent une grande biodiversité, mais sont fortement menacés par la pression foncière. Leur sauvegarde qui aurait pu provenir des structures modernes semble compromise en raison des mythes qui les entourent. Cependant, les acteurs reconnaissent que cet autre patrimoine culturel représente des lieux de mémoire dont la conservation et la valorisation contribueraient à l’entretien d’un cadre de vie sain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".