MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2255359821 · doi:10.13182/nt11-a13311

Neutronic Design and Analysis of a Small Nuclear Reactor to Supply District Heating and Electrical Energy to Canadian Forces Bases Located in the Arctic or the Northern Remote Communities

2011· article· en· W2255359821 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Stéphane G. Paquette, Hugues W. Bonin

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersAtomic Energy of Canada Limited
KeywordsNuclear engineeringDecay heatEnvironmental scienceNeutron transportControl rodNuclear reactor coreCoolantNuclear reactorNuclear power plantElectricityLight-water reactorMechanical engineeringEngineeringNeutronNuclear physicsElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work describes the preliminary design of a 25-MW(thermal) nuclear reactor capable of providing safe and reliable heating and electricity to any Canadian Forces Bases, especially in the Arctic, as well as in comparable civilian applications. The aim of the project is to provide a nuclear reactor system with sufficient inherent safety characteristics as it is intended to run in automatic mode and be monitored by operators with limited experience and training. For the neutronics calculations, the design work of the reactor’s core is carried out using the probabilistic simulation code MCNP 5 along with the Winfrith Improved Multigroup Scheme–Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (WIMS-AECL) deterministic code, Version 3.1, thus permitting a code-to-code comparison of the numerical results. Several design constraints related to coolant temperature and pressure, reactivity control, fuel enrichment, and time between refueling have been considered. The final reactor concept, named the Super Near Boiling 25 reactor (SNB25), provides heat energy dedicated to building and domestic water heating and supplies electricity through an organic Rankine cycle energy conversion plant. SNB25 employs TRISO fuel particles, contained in zirconium-sheathed fuel rods, and is light water cooled and moderated. Complete reactivity control is achieved through simple and reliable mechanical means consisting of 133 control rods and six adjustable radial reflector plates. The optimized reactor core configuration, along with its intrinsic control system, allows for the power plant to operate safely for more than a decade between refuelings from a typical central heating plant or the basement of a multilevel office building. The work also included a preliminary investigation of the nonnuclear part of the energy supply system including heat exchangers and the turbine-driven, electricity-generating system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear TechnologySame topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207