Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper will reflect on the causes that sparked the 2011 revolution in Egypt. It will use social movement theory to explain the formation of the Egyptian uprising that capitalized on domestic and international events to motivate and mobilize the masses. Tunisia’s ousting of former President Ben Ali provided a political opportunity by igniting hope across the Middle East for similar change. This was combined with contentious domestic politics in Egypt that saw rising inflation, unemployment and an expanding youth demographic. The excessive use of force and state repression served as the starting point of resistance against a system that disenfranchised its masses. By looking at recent political history in Egypt, this paper will show how this movement learned from the weaknesses of previous political experiments with change. The pro-democracy (‘Kefaya’) movement and the Worker’s strikes were two political junctures that sought institutional changes but fell short of their aims. The former was unable to incorporate all political parties and instead opened itself to attack by Mubarak’s regime, while the latter was unable to frame the struggle in demands that appealed to everyone. The social movement in Egypt was successful largely because it ignored all ideological and religious differences in pursuit of regime change; it framed the struggle in ways that appealed to the masses; and it used indigenous processes and cultural framings that promoted and entrenched national unity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".