The Market Value of Modularity and Supply Chain Integration: Theory and Evidence from the Solar Photovoltaic Industry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The practice of product development and delivery has shifted increasingly from an individual firm to collaborative efforts along its supply chain and as such, effective supply chain management is seen as a way of obtaining competitive advantage for all firms within the supply chain. If firms are indeed competing in the product markets based on their supply chains, then one would expect to see superior supply chain performance reflected in the capital valuation of these firms. In this proof of concept research, we explore how decisions regarding usage of standards, customization, product and production modularity relate to the stock market valuation of all the firms within the supply chain and then develop a procedure to disentangle the supply chain integration effect on the value of the firm. We construct measures to assess relevant decisions and test hypotheses around the synergy between these constructs in the context of 42 supply chains drawn from the solar photovoltaic energy sector. The results indicate the varying role of modularity, customization and standards in the value of the firm and the supply chain, and quantify the significance of integration and fixed assets in the supply chain valuation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it