MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2255626772

A Unified Approach to Permanent Establishment by Agent in the U.S.

2007· article· en· W2255626772 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin B. Tittle

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreatyFactory (object-oriented programming)Tax treatyAgency (philosophy)Law and economicsIdeal (ethics)BusinessMicroeconomicsTax lawEconomicsIndustrial organizationPolitical scienceEconomyLawDouble taxationComputer scienceSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permanent establishment (PE) is a tax treaty concept that raises the bar for taxation of foreign companies that do business in the United States. A PE is usually defined as a fixed place of business, like an office or factory. However, a PE can also be created in the absence of a fixed place of business by an agent if the agent is other than an agent of independent status. For linguistic convenience, such agents are usually called dependent agents. The rules regarding dependent and independent agents are typically set forth in separate paragraphs in a tax treaty, and dependent and independent agents are usually discussed and analyzed as if they were separate concepts. That approach is less than ideal because it leaves the reader to cobble together the dividing line between the two. This article illustrates a unified approach to the issue of agency PE using Article V of the current, 1980 U.S.-Canada tax treaty as a case study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0100.016
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207