Different ontogeny of rate of force generation and shortening velocity in guinea pig trachealis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Juveniles of many species, including humans, display greater airway responsiveness than do adults. This may involve changes in airway smooth muscle function. In the present work we studied force production and shortening velocity in trachealis from 1-wk-old (1 wk), 3-wk-old (3 wk), and 3-mo-old (adult) guinea pigs. Strips were electrically stimulated (60 Hz, 18 V) at their optimal length (l(o)) to obtain maximum active stress (P(o)) and rate of stress generation. Then, force-velocity curves were elicited at 2.5 s from the onset of the stimulus. By applying a recently developed modification of Hill's equation for airway smooth muscle, the maximum shortening velocity at zero load (V(o)) and the value alpha. gamma/beta, an index of internal resistance to shortening (Rsi), were calculated (alpha, beta, and gamma are the constants of the equation). P(o) increased little with maturation, whereas the rate of stress generation increased significantly (0.40 +/- 0.03, 0.45 +/- 0.03, 0. 51 +/- 0.03 P(o)/s for 1 wk, 3 wk, and adult animals). V(o) slightly increased early with maturation to decrease significantly later (1. 79 +/- 0.67, 2.45 +/- 0.92, and 0.55 +/- 0.09 l(o)/s for 1 wk, 3 wk, and adult animals), whereas the Rsi showed an opposite trend (14.98 +/- 5.19, 8.99 +/- 3.01, and 32.07 +/- 5.54 mN. mm(-2). l(o)(-1). s for 1 wk, 3 wk, and adult animals). This early increase of force generation in combination with late increase of Rsi may explain the changes of V(o) with age. An elevated V(o) may contribute to the incidence of airway hyperresponsiveness in healthy juveniles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".