Toward Understanding of Branching in RAFT Copolymerization of Methyl Methacrylate through a Cleavable Dimethacrylate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) solution copolymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) with a cleavable divinyl comonomer, bis(2-methacryloyl)oxyethyl disulfide (BMAODS). 2-Cyano-2-propyldodecyl trithiocarbonate was used as a RAFT chain transfer agent and 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) as an initiator. The selective cleavage of BMAODS disulfide bonds was used to collect primary chains for the determination of the branching density (BD). The effects of initial monomer concentration, vinyl/divinyl ratio, and primary chain length on the branching and cyclization reactions were thoroughly investigated. It was found that more than 50% pendent double bonds from BMAODS were consumed in cyclization rather than in branching. The BD increased linearly with the conversion up to approximately 60% conversion. The monomer concentration was found to be the most efficient parameter in promoting branching. Increasing divinyl monomer ratio and primary chain length favored cyclization over branching. The work provides experimental evidence to support the random branching mechanism in RAFT copolymerization of vinyl and divinyl monomers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".