MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2255876702

Housing Growth Potential Based Fuzzy Simulation Zonal Ranking: A Case Study Of Indian Metropolitan

2006· article· en· W2255876702 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. E. M. Macwan, Bhimaji K. Katti

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Joint CIB W78, W102, ICCCBE, ICCC, and DMUCE International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, Montreal, Canada, 14-16 June · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Design and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaUrbanizationPopulationEconomic geographyGeographyPopulation growthMegacityEconomic growthSupply and demandDistribution (mathematics)BusinessDevelopment economicsEconomicsEconomyMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Population explosion, industrial development and urbanization are closely interknitted and as such forms a global phenomenon.India, being a third world country has been undergoing through this process in a significant way. The Class-I cities and the Metropolitan cities in particular are under rapid urbanization process. Therefore, these centers are experiencing tremendous pressure on resources and urban infrastructure. In Indian Urban system, the interplay of heterogeneous socio-economic groups, infrastructure system components and resources constraints are subjected to urbanization ambivalence. In this process, urban housing sector has been worst affected with clear cleavage between supply and demand, resulting in huge housing shortage. Therefore, the urgency to reduce the gap between housing requirement and supply can not be underscored. The Indian metropolitan under study is an evolved city. It has recorded highest growth rate in the region as well as state. It has experienced one of the fastest growth rates even at the national level. With the rapid growth the city boundaries are increased. For the sake of administration the area under study is divided in seven zones, but for the purpose of technical study the metropolitan area is divided into twenty various study zones. The delineation was based on population distribution and aerial features. Zonal housing growth potential can be defined as ability of a zone to attract the house demanding population to satisfy their actual demand in the varying affordable manner. The housing Growth Potential varies from zone to zone. It is a complex phenomenon and depends upon various varying parameters. On the basis of various pilot housing studies and correlation findings few major factors were found highly influencing.Therefore, the parameters involved are pertaining to land, where the land value plays the major role. Secondly road features like accessibility and road area network are significant. Thirdly the utility services provided to the people are also important. Apart from this, the ongoing Housing activities and the population density are also playing the major role. The Urban area is dynamic in nature. The urban zones have built in potential to attract the people and thus influence the entire city also. Very surprisingly it can be stated that the zonal potential for housing growth varies with time and policies of the planners. It is a unique exhibition of manmade and natural interplay. 1 Asst. Professor, Civil Engineering Dept., S.V. National Institute of Tech., Surat, India Phones +91 261 222337174, + 91 9427148108, macwan112@yahoo.co.in 2 Professor Emeritus, Civil Engineering Dept., S.V. National Institute of Tech., Surat, India. Phone + 91261 2211967 June 14-16, 2006 Montreal, Canada Joint International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Joint CIB W78, W102, ICCCBE, ICCC, and DMUCE International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, Montreal, Canada, 14-16 JuneSame topicUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisFrench-language works237,207