MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2256009279

Nurse Educators' Lived Experiences of Student-Centered Teaching in Practice Settings: A Proposed Interpretive Phenomenology

2015· article· en· W2256009279 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSTTI Leadership Connection · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicProblem and Project Based Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumNurse educationNursingHealth carePsychologyMedical educationMedicinePedagogySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arundell, F., & Cioffi, J. (2005). Using a simulation strategy: An educator's experience. Nurse Education in Practice, 5, 296 301. Avdal, E. U. (2012). The effect of self-directed learning abilities of student nurses on success in Turkey. Nurse Education Today, 33(8), 838-41. Blumberg, P. (2008) Developing Learner-centered teaching: A practical guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Candela, L., Dalley, K., & Benzel-Lindley, J. (2006). A case for learner-centered curricula Journal of Nursing Education, 45(2), 59–66. Colley, S. L. (2012). Implementing a change to a learner-centered philosophy in a school of nursing: Faculty perceptions. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(4), 229-233. Higgs, J., & McAllister, L. (2005). The lived experiences of clinical educators with implications for their preparation, support and professional development. Learning in Health & Social Care, 4(3), 156171. Institute of Medicine (2010). The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Retrieved December 2013 from http://iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2010/The-Future-ofNursing/Future Munhall, P. (2012). Nursing research. A qualitative perspective (5th ed). Mississauga: Jones & Bartlett Learning. National League for Nursing (2008). Position statement: Preparing the next generation of nurses to practice in a technology-rich environment: An informatics agenda. Tiwari, A., Lai, P., So, M., & Yuen, K. (2006). A comparison of the effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of students' critical thinking. Medical Education, 40(6), 547-554. Tseng, H., Chou, F., Wang, H., Ko, H., Jian, S. & Weng, W. (2011). The effectiveness of problem-based learning and concept mapping among Taiwanese registered nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 31(8), e41-e46. Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of Practice. Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. Walnut Creek, California, USA: Left Coast Press Inc. Weimer, M. (2013). Learner centered teaching. Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Zavertnik, J. E., Huff, T. A., & Munro, C. L. (2010). Innovative approach to teaching communication skills to nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(2), 65-71. (Weimer, 2013) Student Function of content

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it