MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2256283876 · doi:10.1177/0971097320120105

Profile of Deaths due to Electrocution: A Retrospective Study

2012· article· en· W2256283876 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhotovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrocutionAccidentalMedicineDemographyPopulationRetrospective cohort studyMedical emergencyEnvironmental healthVeterinary medicineForensic engineeringSurgeryEngineeringSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We carried out a retrospective analysis of deaths due to electrocution from the medico-legal deaths reported to our institution.Majority of the victims were males belonging to the age group of 11-50 years.Almost all deaths were accidental and most of them were concentrated in the period of monsoon implicating the important role of wetness in causing these deaths.In contrast to the studies done in the West, bathtubs, heaters or hair dryers were not involved in any of the deaths.The mortality rate due to electrocution was significantly higher at 4.4 per one lakhs (100000) population in the present study as against the figures of 0.94 and 0.14 from Bulgaria and Canada respectively.Most of the deaths were either instantaneous or immediate and most of the deaths were preventable by electrocution.It signifies that people living at home did not have elementary knowledge of risks of electrocution; therefore awareness about use of good quality electric appliances and cables is the need of the hour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it