Development of a low-cost, portable, tablet-based eye tracking system for children with impairments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eye tracking technology can enable children with severe speech and motor impairment to communicate. Eye tracking systems for the use of human computer interaction have long been an area of interest in the assistive technology field. However, a number of factors have prevented eye tracking from being an accessible technology, including the invasiveness, robustness, availability, and cost of eye tracking systems. Moreover, a common drawback of some commercial eye tracking systems is that head motion is not typically considered, and many systems are not portable or mobile. This work describes the design and development of an eye tracking system for children with disabilities. The system is an economical alternative to commercially available devices. It does not require any sophisticated hardware, and is tablet-based. It uses raw images from a webcam and relies on distinct features of the eye that can be detected and tracked using image processing functions. The simple eye tracking system can differentiate between 16 different points of gaze enabling the user to have access to 16 options on a 4 by 4 display.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".