MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Additional variables other than AJCC staging show clinical utility for predicting survival in colon cancer

2007· article· en· W2256449171 on OpenAlexaff
Sam M. Wiseman, Samuel Leung, Obi L. Griffith, Stuart Jones, Hamid Masoudi, P. Terry Phang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLymphovascular invasionUnivariate analysisColorectal cancerStage (stratigraphy)CancerMultivariate analysisInternal medicinePathologicalResection marginSurvival analysisOncologyCohortLymph nodeDiseaseSurgeryMetastasisResection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

14584 Background: The most important predictor of colon cancer patient outcome is disease stage at the time of surgery. However, staging does not accurately predict survival for all patients undergoing a resection with curative intent. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical and pathological characteristics of patients undergoing curative colon cancer, in order to identify characteristics, in addition to stage, predictive of disease outcome. Methods: Between 1997 and 2005 data for 114 patients undergoing curative resection for colon cancer at a tertiary care institution were collected. Clinical and pathological characteristics evaluated were: age, gender, tumor location, tumor size, scheduled vs emergent surgery, pathologic margin status, TNM stage, pathologic grade, number of positive lymph nodes, total number of lymph nodes resected, vascular and lymphatic invasion. Characteristics found to be significant in a Kaplan-Meier univariate survival analysis were included in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Patient outcomes studied were overall survival, cancer specific survival, and disease free survival. Results: From the 114 patients examined in this cohort the mean age was 67 years, the male to female ratio was 0.8:1, and the mean follow up time was 2.61 years. Overall survival, cancer specific survival, and disease free survival were calculated to be 83.3%, 91.2% and 84.2%, respectively. Statistically significant variables by univariate analysis were: AJCC stage, number of positive lymph nodes, pathologic N stage, lymphatic and vascular invasion by the primary tumor. Further multivariate analysis revealed that lymphatic invasion was the only significant independent influence for predicting disease recurrence. Conclusions: Clinicopathologic characteristics, in addition to AJCC disease stage, may be of clinical utility in predicting outcome for patients who have undergone curative resection for colon cancer. Further evaluation of these clinicopathologic characteristics should be carried out in a larger colon cancer patient cohort. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal and Anal CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207