MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2256500242 · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv763

Sampletrees and Rsampletrees: sampling gene genealogies conditional on SNP genotype data

2016· article· en· W2256500242 on OpenAlexafffund
Kelly M. Burkett, Brad McNeney, Jinko Graham

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsR packageComputer scienceDocumentationMarkov chain Monte CarloSource codeCode (set theory)SNPGenotypeMarkov chainData miningMonte Carlo methodProgramming languageStatisticsBiologyGeneticsGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: : The program sampletrees is a Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler of gene genealogies conditional on either phased or unphased SNP genotype data. The companion program Rsampletrees is for pre- and post-processing of sampletrees files, including setting up the files for sampletrees and storing and plotting the output of a sampletrees run. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: sampletrees is implemented in C ++. The source code, documentation and test files are available at http://stat.sfu.ca/statgen/research/sampletrees.html The R package Rsampletrees is available on CRAN http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rsampletrees/index.html CONTACT: : kburkett@uottawa.ca SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207