Влияние ретроспективной оценки материнского стиля воспитания, реализуемого в детстве, на проявления алекситимии и эмпатии у молодежи с полинаркоманией
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the research – the study of the impact of retrospective assessment of maternal parenting style, implemented in childhood manifestations of alexithymia and empathy at young people with polydrug. Subject of research – manifestations of alexithymia and empathic abilities of youth with polydrug, depending on he parameters of a retrospective evaluation of maternal parenting style, implementedin childhood. 50 polydrug patients, aged 20 to 30 years, a period of remission from 1.5 to 3 months and 50 – in the control group, participated in the research. We used Toronto alexithymia scale, test ADOR “Teens about parents” (E. Shafer) and test for the diagnostic of empathy (V. V. Boyko). As a result, it was found, that the highestlevels of alexithymia and low values of empathy observed in inconsistent policy and hostile educational styles of mother, according to a retrospective evaluation of the subjects in the group of patients with polydrug, and in the control group. In the groupof patients with polydrug, compared with the control group, revealed statistically signiZcant di[erences between the retrospective assessment of mother’ educational style of parameters, such as “authoritativeness”, “hostility”, “inconsistency”, that exceededthe value of the control group, as well as the parameters “positive interest”, “autonomy”, that were expressed signiZcantly lower than in the control group. The degree of alexithymia at patients with polydrug is directly proportional to the severity of the “hostile” in the retrospective evaluation of the educational style of mother,and inversely proportional to the “autonomy”. As further perspectives of our research can be designated the study of the impactof the mother’ image on the formation of motivational trends, motivational orientation in interpersonal communication and communication systems of the addicted patients, that may contribute to the improvement of psychocorrection rehabilitationprograms for patients with drug addiction and for their families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".