MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2256562934

A Critical Analysis on UBC Thrive as a Mental Health Promotion

2015· article· en· W2256562934 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kimberly Rose Pineda Singian

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth professional student journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthHealth promotionPromotion (chess)Psychological interventionPsychologyNursingFailure to thrivePublic relationsMedical educationMedicinePolitical sciencePublic healthPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, mental health is a growing challenge in which one in five Canadians will likely experience a mental health issue in their lifetime (Canadian Mental Health Association, 2011). The University of British Columbia (UBC) School of Nursing offers a graduate course that explores the role of health promotion in varying practice settings. A workplace mental health promotion called Thrive was initiated in 2008 for the students, faculty, and staff at UBC. Since its inception, there was a lack of assessment on its effectiveness on promoting mental health when this paper was written in 2013. Thus, I critically analyze the adequacy of Thrive at UBC relative to its theoretical underpinnings, current debates on benefits and limitations, influencing contexts for engagement, and recommendations for improvement. This class paper will be of interest for any health professional involved in health promotion strategies and interventions while considering the importance of the socioeconomic contexts of individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.601
Teacher spread0.438 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth professional student journalSame topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207