Sustainable development – triple bottom line reporting: A study on ITC limited
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainable Development means economic progress coupled with upgrading social and ecological capital. Sustainable Development is about the Triple Bottom Line -across three dimensions namely Economic, Social and Ecological -creating economic, social and ecological wealth. There are three kinds of businesses in the context of sustainable development: First -those that pursue shareholder value creation above all else. Such companies exist from quarter to quarter, focused solely on their incomes, leaving a deferred burden for somebody else to take care of. Second -those that pursue shareholder value and comply with Regulations. Compliance would ensure adherence to minimum acceptable standards. Third -are those enterprises that are willing to go that Extra Mile, beyond the dictates of Regulation. Such companies do not view shareholder value as the end in itself. They are driven by a super ordinate goal, a Commitment beyond the Market. A meaningful research, in collaboration with academia, business and industry is to find innovative solutions that address the sustainability challenges of economies. ITC is one such company which has been creating enduring value by following the Triple Bottom Line Reporting and its market capitalization has multiplied 50 times during the last 17 years. This paper aims at highlighting the exemplary Triple Bottom Line Reporting, which is the most enduring contribution of ITC Limited which is helpful to our Country and to the Society at large.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".