MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2256788690 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.024408

X-ray scattering study of pyrochlore iridates: Crystal structure, electronic, and magnetic excitations

2016· article· en· W2256788690 on OpenAlexafffund
J. P. Clancy, H. Gretarsson, E. K. H. Lee, Di Tian, Jungho Kim, M. H. Upton, D. Casa, T. Gög, Z. Islam, Byung-Gu Jeon, Kee Hoon Kim, Serge Desgreniers, Yong Baek Kim, STONE JULIAN

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Toronto
FundersWestern Economic Diversification CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOffice of ScienceArgonne National LaboratorySeoul National UniversityCanadian Light SourceUniversity of TorontoCanada Foundation for InnovationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsPyrochloreCondensed matter physicsResonant inelastic X-ray scatteringAntiferromagnetismCrystallographyGround stateScatteringElectronic structureCrystal (programming language)Inelastic scatteringAtomic physicsInelastic neutron scatteringPhase (matter)ChemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have investigated the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of the pyrochlore iridates ${\mathrm{Eu}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ir}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ and ${\mathrm{Pr}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ir}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ using a combination of resonant elastic x-ray scattering, x-ray powder diffraction, and resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS). The structural parameters of ${\mathrm{Eu}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ir}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ have been examined as a function of temperature and applied pressure, with a particular emphasis on regions of the phase diagram where electronic and magnetic phase transitions have been reported. We find no evidence of crystal symmetry change over the range of temperatures ($\ensuremath{\sim}6$ to 300 K) and pressures ($\ensuremath{\sim}0.1$ to 17 GPa) studied. We have also investigated the electronic and magnetic excitations in single-crystal samples of ${\mathrm{Eu}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ir}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ and ${\mathrm{Pr}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ir}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ using high-resolution Ir ${\mathrm{L}}_{3}$-edge RIXS. In spite of very different ground state properties, we find that these materials exhibit qualitatively similar excitation spectra, with crystal field excitations at $\ensuremath{\sim}3--5$ eV, spin-orbit excitations at $\ensuremath{\sim}0.5--1$ eV, and broad low-lying excitations below $\ensuremath{\sim}0.15$ eV. In single-crystal samples of ``Eu-rich'' ${\mathrm{Eu}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ir}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ (found to possess an actual stoichiometry of ${\mathrm{Eu}}_{2.18}{\mathrm{Ir}}_{1.82}{\mathrm{O}}_{7.06})$ we observe highly damped magnetic excitations at $\ensuremath{\sim}45$ meV, which display significant momentum dependence. We compare these results with recent dynamical structure factor calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207