Altered ligand binding and transcriptional regulation by mutations in the PML/RARα ligand-binding domain arising in retinoic acid–resistant patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by a specific translocation, t(15;17), that fuses the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) gene with the RA receptor RARalpha. Pharmacologic doses of retinoic acid (RA) induce differentiation in human APL cells and complete clinical remissions. Unfortunately, APL cells develop resistance to RA in vitro and in vivo. Recently, mutations in PML/RARalpha have been described in APL cells from patients clinically resistant to RA therapy. The mutations cluster in 2 regions that are involved in forming the binding pocket for RA. These mutant PML/RARalpha proteins have been expressed in vitro, which shows that they cause a diversity of alterations in binding to ligand and to nuclear coregulators of transcription, leading to varying degrees of inhibition of retinoid-induced transcription. This contrasts with the nearly complete dominant negative activity of mutations in PML/RARalpha previously characterized in cell lines developing RA resistance in vitro. Current data from this study provide additional insight into the molecular mechanisms of resistance to RA and suggest that alterations in the ability of mutants to interact with coregulators can be determinant in the molecular mechanism of resistance to RA. In particular, ligand-induced binding to the coactivator ACTR correlated better with transcriptional activation of RA response elements than the ligand-induced release of the corepressor SMRT. The diversity of effects that are seen in patient-derived mutations may help explain the partial success to date of attempts to overcome this mechanism of resistance in patients by the clinical use of histone deacetylase inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".