Photoluminescence Efficiency of Ge Dots Self-Assembled on SiO<sub>2</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Self-assembled Ge nanodots were formed by in-situ thermal annealing of a thin amorphous Ge layer deposited by molecular beam epitaxy on a thin SiO 2 or TiO 2 layer on Si(001). The dot photoluminescence (PL) appeared primarily as a wide near-infrared band peaked near 800 meV. Using both the k•p and tight binding theoretical models, we have analyzed the PL spectrum in terms of the dot size distribution required to reproduce the observed asymmetric band shape. The peak energy of the PL band reflects the average dot size and its shape depends on the dot size distribution. The observed size distribution determined from transmission electron and atomic force microscopy allowed the determination of the nonlinear increase in the PL quantum efficiency with decreasing dot diameter. In addition, we show it is possible to evaluate the size distribution of Ge dots from their PL energy dependence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".