MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2257164194

78. Spatial and Temporal Extension of Large Basin Hydrometeorological Records Using a Distributed Modelling Approach

2004· article· en· W2257164194 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jürgen Lang, Janet H. P. Wong, Stephen J. Burges, Maurice Danard

Bibliographic record

VenueTunnelling and Underground Space Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrometeorologyStructural basinEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationTerrainMesoscale meteorologyStreamflowElevation (ballistics)Hydrology (agriculture)Hydrological modellingClimatologyDrainage basinLand coverMeteorologyLand useGeologyGeographyCartographyMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of simulation models to analyse impacts of water management decisions for large river basins is constrained by lack of available streamflow and meteorological records of adequate duration, quality, and spatial distribution. This paper describes an effort to extend the limited meteorological and hydrometric records for the Peace River basin, an area encompassing nearly 300,000 km2 in western Canada. For temperature and precipitation, continuous spatial and temporal datasets were developed for 1909–1997 using a combination of surface observations, coarse mesh upper air data, and a mesoscale boundary layer model incorporating terrain effects. An analogue technique was used for the period prior to the availability of upper air data. A distributed hydrological model “WATFLOOD/SPL” with parameterization based on land cover Grouped Response Units (GRUs) was applied to the basin. The model is an effective tool for estimating streamflows from ungauged areas and for running long-term water management simulations,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTunnelling and Underground Space TechnologySame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207