De la conduite du changement instrumentalisée au changement agile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 40 ans, la conduite du changement est devenue une pratique gestionnaire courante dans la plupart des organisations du fait du rôle croissant des changements et des attentes du corps social en termes d’accompagnement. Un travail d’analyse historique sur les pratiques de conduite du changement montre cinq paradigmes installés. Le dernier paradigme intitulé « Paradigme Expérientiel » montre les limites du modèle classique de la conduite du changement instrumentalisé développé à partir des travaux de Kanter (1992). Jugé trop bureaucratique et pas assez collaboratif, ce modèle évolue vers le changement agile. En privilégiant les boucles d’expériences à partir d’ateliers participatifs et un pilotage de la transformation dans une logique de développement de la capacité à changer, le changement agile apparaît comme une solution aux questions actuelles de la conduite du changement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".