MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2257297017 · doi:10.21007/etd.cghs.2012.0232

The Traditional Roles of Caring for Elders: Views from First Nations Elders Regarding Health, Violence, and Elder Abuse

2012· dissertation· en· W2257297017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eileen Owen-Williams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicElder Abuse and Neglect
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth Science Center, University of Tennessee
KeywordsElder abuseParticipatory action researchContext (archaeology)Domestic violenceCitizen journalismStructural violenceNarrativePolitical scienceMedicineCriminologyEconomic growthGerontologySociologyPoison controlSuicide preventionGeographyPoliticsLawEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study sought to respectfully understand Northern British Columbia First Nations Elders' views regarding health of communities, intergenerational relationships, Elder roles, and violence towards Elders.Injuries, both intentional and unintentional, are a leading cause of death for First Nations Peoples.Information regarding Elder abuse in First Nations communities is lacking, though family violence has been identified as a problem within First Nations communities.The goal of this research was to understand the point of view and Elders' reality through the creation of a dialogue with Elders, and to discern the interface between Traditional First Nations' belief systems, healing methods, and current legal and health care systems within Canada.This study used a community-based participatory research design to explore social and cultural context through the views of Carrier Sekani Elders in the Ts'il Kaz Koh community.The design acted to support the aims of the study which were: To explore how First Nations Elders understand violence in their communities, to explore what First Nations Elders believe gives rise to violence in First Nations communities; to illuminate the factors that First Nations Elder view as affecting the safety and well-being of Elders living in First Nations communities; to explore First Nations Elders' narration of intergenerational relationships before and after contact; and to make clear factors which First Nations Elders view as required for Elders to remain safe and stay within their respective communities.The study followed the CIHR Guidelines for Research with Aboriginal Peoples.Approval was obtained from Carrier Sekani Family Services' Research Review Committee, from the Ts'il Kaz Koh Chief and Council and Ts'il Kaz Koh Community, the Ethics Review Board of the University of Northern British Columbia, and the Institutional Review Board of the University of Tennessee.Informed consent was obtained both from the Ts'il Kaz Koh community and from participating Elders, utilizing Ts'il Kaz Koh cultural protocol.Six Ts'il Kaz Koh Elders residing in Northern British Columbia participated in interviews utilizing an interview guide.Interviews were then read, categorized, and coded according to identified concepts, allowing for retrieval of themes.Codes were submitted to two committee members for review and consensus regarding the categories of each code for reliability.Both a domain analysis and a taxonomic analysis were performed on the data.A convergent analysis of themes was performed to assure internal and external validity.The findings were presented to the Elders at each step of the analysis to ensure validity and reliability.The final document was presented to the community to ensure that all information was accurate and acceptable to the community.Limitations of the study include the limited sample of Elders solely from the Ts'il Kaz Koh (Burns Lake) community.This limitation is also viewed as an opportunity for the Ts'il Kaz Koh to request program development funding as a pilot initiative.This sample limited to one First Nations community prohibits the generalization of findings to other communities until further research occurs with other communities.Themes related to the problems of violence were multiple, including changes from Traditional way of living to contemporary way of life, changes from the Residential School experience, loss of Traditional roles, and change in community from communal structure to that of nuclear family units, and the influence of alcohol and drugs on individuals and families.Sub-themes related to violence included the loss of intergenerational relationships, changes in Elder roles from the past, and the change in roles and behavior from the past across all ages.Also identified as sub-themes were the influences of change from that of communal caring, to individuals watching out for their own welfare, and the change from hard work being valued within Traditional roles to lack of value for hard work in contemporary society.Disruption of intergeneration roles within the community was also identified as a theme related to violence.Recommendations from this study include the need to further research the views of Elders surrounding violence and Elder abuse in other First Nations communities, with translation to clinical practice and the development of a culturally appropriate screening tool for First Nations Elder safety and abuse.Further research with other First Nations communities will allow generalization of results to be utilized in program development and evaluation.This study supports the utilization of the health determinants model in program planning and the developing of capacity for First Nations to control their health care services.The findings of this study also support the need for funding of Youth-Elder initiatives which foster the reestablishment of intergenerational relationships and the concurrent translation of Elders' Traditional knowledge.Utilizing Elders as leaders and a source of Traditional health knowledge is part of a viable model of combining contemporary and Traditional health care practices.The Elders' views supported the importance of a strength-based approach to healing with the prior work of McCormick who found that effective healing for First Nations people must have a focus on "interconnectedness" rather than personal autonomy in order for communities to heal.This study would like to acknowledge the strength of these Elders and the Ts'il Kaz Koh community to deal with the historical trauma of Residential Schools and the effects on individual, family and community health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElder Abuse and NeglectFrench-language works237,207