MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2257317

The Gate Control Theory: Reaching for the Brain.

2004· article· en· W2257317 on OpenAlex
Ronald Melzack, Joel Katz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCognitive Science and Education Research
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl (management)Computer scienceComputer securityArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human innate resistance to P. falciparum malaria is based on genetic features that affect several stages of the intraerythrocytic cycle of the plasmodia. HbS, HbE and alpha and beta thalassemia (in addition to G-6PD deficiency) are protective to the carriers, because they inhibit the intraerythrocytic growth period, and in the case of AS red cells, in addition, parasitosis make them detectable expeditiously by the spleen. Blood group polymorphisms can interfere with red cell invasion by plasmodia. HbC belongs to a special category, since it apparently interferes with the cycle at the moment of cell lysis and release of merozoites. Finally, ovalocytosis observed in South East Asia, which most likely corresponds to a cytoskeleton or membrane protein defect, protects from malaria by inhibiting invasion. It should be kept in mind that many of these red cell defects might protect individuals in the critical first 5 years of life by retarding the switch of HbF to adult hemoglobin, since the HbF containing red cells are less than hospitable to the parasite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Science and Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207