MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2257716997 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2015-0136

CXCL6 promotes human hepatocyte proliferation through the CXCR1–NFκB pathway and inhibits collagen I secretion by hepatic stellate cells

2016· article· en· W2257716997 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhenghong Li, Qidi Zhang, Qingqing Zhang, Mingyi Xu, Ying Qu, Xiaobo Cai, Lungen Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver physiology and pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHepatocyteGene knockdownSecretionHepatic stellate cellAspartate transaminaseCancer researchCell growthMolecular biologyCell cultureIn vitroEndocrinologyBiochemistryEnzymeAlkaline phosphatase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hepatocyte proliferation and collagen I (COLI) secretion are important processes during liver regeneration. This study aimed to investigate the role of CXCL6 in hepatocyte proliferation and COLI secretion. Serum CXCL6 levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were examined and the effects of CXCL6 on the proliferation of L02 hepatocytes and the secretion of COLI from LX2 human hepatic stellate cells were evaluated. We found that serum CXCL6 levels increased gradually with disease progression of CHB, and there was positive correlation between serum CXCL6 level and alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST). In vitro, CXCL6 promoted L02 proliferation but this was blocked upon CXCR1 knockdown. The level of phospho-IκBα was upregulated by CXCL6 but downregulated by CXCR1 siRNA in L02 cells. CXCL6 inhibited the secretion of COLI by LX2 cells, dependent on CXCR1 and CXCR2. Taken together, these data suggest that increased expression of CXCL6 during CHB could promote hepatocyte proliferation through the CXCR1-NFκB pathway and inhibit the secretion of COLI by hepatic stellate cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicLiver physiology and pathologyFrench-language works237,207