MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W225784793

Colobomatus embiotocae (Copepoda : Philichthyidae) from Shiner perch, Cymatogaster aggregata (Osteichthyes : Embiotocidae) in Canadian waters

2000· article· en· W225784793 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shelley F. Jepps, Timothy M. Goater

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative Parasitology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCopepodFaunaPerchFisherySan JoaquinRange (aeronautics)CrustaceanEstuaryEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>Environmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During an examination of the parasitic crustacean fauna of shiner perch, Cymatogaster aggregata (Embiotocidae) from eastern Vancouver Island in Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada, the copepod, Colobomatus embiotocae Noble, Collard, and Wilkes, 1969 (Philichthyidae), was noted in the sensory ducts of the preopercular cephalic canals. Prevalence and mean intensity of C. embiotocae were 59.2% and 1.36 ± 0.57, respectively. This parasite was also recovered from 68.4% (mean intensity = 1.62 ± 0.65) of shiner perch sampled near Bamfield Marine Station on the western coast of Vancouver Island. The high prevalence of C. embiotocae probably reflects increased transmission resulting from the aggregation behavior of the fish host. These results establish a range extension for C. embiotocae in C. aggregata to include Canadian Pacific waters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative ParasitologySame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207