Bibliographic record
Abstract
Henri J. M. Nouwen (1932-1996), known best for his books--The Wounded Healer and The Return of the Prodigal Son?was the author of over 40 books on the spiritual life that witnessed to a spirituality of the as the deepest meaning of theology. A Dutch psychologist, Roman Catholic priest and popular author, Nouwen taught pastoral theology at Notre Dame, Yale and Harvard Universities before becoming pastor of L’Arche community near Toronto. His major contribution to Christian spirituality and Christian education is an emphasis on the primacy of the over head. The spirituality of the is what is prior to and beyond cognitive belief. In all religions and faith traditions, beliefs matter, right actions matter, and proper rituals are important. But what is most important is a good, right and warm heart. Since considers the quality of the before judging cognitive beliefs of the mind or the actions of the body, the way of the is key for Nouwen doing theology and in teaching from center. The spiritual is the primary reality and spiritual construct in the theology of Henri Nouwen. The word heart in Scripture is a metaphor for spiritual life at its depth. It is the center of being, well of emotions, out of which may flow both good and evil thoughts and actions. The spiritual feels and intuits reality, which nourishes beliefs and actions, attitudes and passions. Mystically, according to Nouwen, our heart--the center of being--is a part of God. It is that sacred space within us where dwells and we are invited to dwell with God. The Way of the Heart in the spirituality of Nouwen is the way of inner purity and transformation, beginning with a spiritual awakening, purification, growth and development of a divine in the body of a human being, lived out in community and service in the world. The Practice of the Heart is called compassion. It is the experience of letting your be broken by the things that break the of God and acting on this visceral intuition of Divine will. This is what it means to live and teach from the center of being, prior to and beyond cognitive belief. This is the spirit of practical theology and Christian education, even in a technological age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".