MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2257904806 · doi:10.4000/itineraires.2700

Vie sociale et vie intérieure : la position lyrique dans les sonnets de Gwendolyn Brooks, Pier Paolo Pasolini et Tony Harrison

2015· article· fr· W2257904806 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Vuong

Bibliographic record

VenueItinéraires · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Cavendish
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtRite of passagePhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le récit poétique d’une société créatrice d’altérité, ces trois poètes impliquent non seulement leur alter ego poétique dans l’arène sociale, mais mettent en danger leur voix lyrique, qu’une certaine polyphonie sociale peut couvrir ou nuancer. Ils refusent notamment la valeur admise des rites sociaux, qu’ils contestent à la première personne, et proposent à la place un ensemble de rites idiosyncrasiques, qui prennent et que permet la forme du sonnet, qui en vient à canaliser la contestation des poètes et à constituer un rite en soi, sur le plan poétique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.020
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueItinérairesSame topicFrench Literature and PoetryFrench-language works237,207