Trafficking in women and the feminization of migration : the Canadian context.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last five years the phenomenon of in to Canada has emerged from relative obscurity to become one issue that has received considerable attention among Canadian governmental policymakers law enforcement officials and academic scholars. In 1996 when the Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women (GAATW) Canada began preliminary research aimed at developing a Canadian profile of trafficking in women as part of an international report being compiled by GAATW (Bangkok) and the Foundation Against Trafficking in Women (STV based in the Netherlands) we found that there was a dearth of available information about women who had migrated to Canada for the purposes of marriage or to work in the sex industry or had been trafficked into these sites. In stark contrast to many countries of the South and in Europe we also realized that trafficking in women had received little notice among Canadas governmental agencies a situation compounded by a general lack of public awareness about the issue. Furthermore the few non-governmental organizations in Canada and the United States that had gathered information on or were working with trafficked women and migrant workers were scattered across North America and had little or no contact with each other. (excerpt)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".