MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2258129741 · doi:10.1353/ccj.2014.0006

The effect of the availability of firearms on homicide rates in Quebec from 1974 to 2006: a time series analysis

2014· article· en· W2258129741 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maxime Reeves-Latour, Étienne Blais

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGun Ownership and Violence Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomicideContext (archaeology)Poison controlCriminologyInjury preventionGun violenceSuicide preventionDemographyGeographyPsychologyMedicineMedical emergencySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article evaluates the relationship between gun availability and homicide rates in Quebec between 1974 and 2006. It stands out from previous research, on the one hand, by creating gun availability proxies according to gun legal status and, on the other, by conceptualizing homicide rates according to their context of commission. Proxies and homicide rates time series were analysed using an ARIMA model. Significant relationships are noticed when both phenomena are evaluated at the same measurement time. These results make it difficult to confirm any causality patterns between gun availability proxies and the various homicide rates employed. In other words, we can't confirm whether gun availability influences homicide rates, or if homicide rates are what has an impact on the tendency for Canadians to acquire guns. RESULTS, however, suggest that gun availability has a close relationship with one particular homicide rate - namely, spousal homicides. An increase in spousal homicide is reflected, in the short run, by an increase in long guns availability. Thereafter, an increase in this particular type of gun is followed by a significant drop in spousal homicides. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering both the context in which homicides are committed and the legal status of guns used in such contexts when assessing the relationship between gun availability and crime of violence., Cet article estime la relation entre la disponibilite des armes a feu (AAF) et les homicides au Quebec de 1974 a 2006. L'article se distingue des recherches prealablement realisees, d'une part, en operationnalisant des indicateurs de disponibilite selon le statut de l'arme et, d'autre part, en creant des taux d'homicide tenant compte de leur contexte. Des series chronologiques furent analysees a l'aide d'une modelisation ARIMA. Les relations significatives s'observent principalement lorsque les deux phenomenes sont consideres au meme temps de mesure. Par consequent, il demeure difficile de determiner si les AAF influent sur le taux d'homicide ou bien si ce sont les homicides qui affectent la disponibilite des AAF. La disponibilite des AAF entretient toutefois des liens etroits avec les homicides dans un contexte bien precis, soit celui des homicides conjugaux. Une augmentation des homicides conjugaux se traduit par une hausse de la disponibilite des armes longues. Par la suite, une recrudescence dans la disponibilite de ce type d'armes s'accompagne d'une baisse des homicides conjugaux. L'interpretation des resultats met l'accent sur l'importance des contextes et du statut de l'arme lors de l'etude de la disponibilite des AAF et des violences criminelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal JusticeSame topicGun Ownership and Violence ResearchFrench-language works237,207