Interaction Forces between Supported Lipid Bilayers in the Presence of PEGylated Polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the surface forces apparatus (SFA), interaction forces between supported lipid bilayers were measured in the presence of polyethylene glycol and two other commercially available pegylated triblock polymers, Pluronic F68 and F127. Pluronic F68 has a smaller central hydrophobic block compared to F127 and therefore is more hydrophilic. The study aimed to unravel the effects of polymer architecture and composition on the interactions between the bilayers. Our keys findings show that below the critical aggregation concentration (CAC) of the polymers, a soft, weakly anchored, polymer layer is formed on the surface of the bilayers. The anchoring strength of this physisorbed layer was found to increase significantly with the size of the hydrophobic block of the polymer, and was strongest for the more hydrophobic polymer, F127. Above the CAC, a dense polymer layer, exhibiting gel-like properties, was found to rapidly grow on the bilayers even after mechanical disruption. The cohesive interaction maintaining the gel layer structure was found to be stronger for F127, and was also found to promote the formation of highly structured aggregates on the bilayers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".